About Me

Name: D W W...
Email: dwwrobertson@hotmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Bush is Right On, Obama should Move On: Meanwhile the McCain Express Rides On to the Presidency!

Bush speaks against appeasement, Obama responds.

According to this MSNBC article, on May 15, 2008 before the Israeli Knesset, President Bush said the following:

"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is — the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

Okay President Bush is right on here. Everyone knows, but the Democrats neglect, that conservatives believe in attempting negotiations with civilized people and groups before using military force against them. In the case of completely uncivilized maniacs like Hamas, Al-Qaida and the Nazis there is no need to negotiate. We must tell them to stop. Currently, for example, the nations represented by the UN are in total agreement that no one is to negotiate with Hamas until the terrorist group stops targeting innocent civilians and have issued resolutions to the affect. The same was true when Saddam Hussein claimed that he had weapons of mass destruction. What has the left said in these cases? In the case of Saddam Hussein, the left have cried out that it is not worth our sacrifices to liberate the people of Iraq, stop the murderous dictator that ordered the genocide of the people of Kuwait, and believed in the total destruction of Israel. What did the left ask for? More negotiations. In the former case, the sniveling, sick former president Jimmy Carter is meeting with Hamas as they launch rockets into Israel daily and called his meeting with these terrorists “fun.” This is clearly an ideology that we’re dealing with in America and Bush is right on!

Obama took the statement personally and said the following:

"It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack," Obama said in the statement his aides distributed. "George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the president's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel."

Obama is all over the map as usual. First off, what is false about President Bush’s statement? If Obama agrees with Bush, why doesn’t Obama consider Bush’s statement a criticism of Moveon.org? Secondly, Obama is lying. Everyone knows that Obama has suggested having negotiation talks with the leaders of Iran who are currently supplying arms and sponsoring attacks targeting American troops in Iraq. Also, Iraq’s President is a holocaust denying, anti-Semite who favors the destruction of Israel (I know those descriptors were redundant, I just wanted to drive the point home.). Obama has said that he wants to meet with a man who won’t even acknowledge the legitimacy of the existence of a Jewish state and Obama thinks of Israel as a “stalwart ally”? Obama loves Israel, he just went a church that published statements by Hamas in their church bulletin for the free donuts. Obama loves Israel, he just associates with anti-Semitic, anti-Americans namely his recent campaign advisor Rober Malley, campaign fundraiser, William Ayers, and campaign contributor, Tony Rezko because he enjoys talking politics while sipping lattes and getting the campaign strategy, the weather report, and paying his rent all in one shot.

Finally, the really disturbing part is that Obama believes, and Nancy Pelosi agrees, that foreign policy should be off the table for political discussion. Of course foreign policy is legitimate in political discourse. When the Democrats are pandering to the far left Code Pink types by running on a platform of surrender, cut, and run in Iraq…when Democrats want to abandon the people of Iraq in the midst of the battle for their freedom…when Democrats want to see our military defeated, of course foreign policy is legitimate political discussion!! But Obama says this is nothing more than the “politics of fear,” unlike those who say that we are to be inundated with water and all die by hurricane if we don’t regulate carbon-emissions. Yeah, carbon-emissions are legitimate. Last time I picked up a paper, I read that people are actually dying from terrorist attacks daily. I think Obama has his priorities confused.

You know the real reason why Obama doesn’t want to talk about foreign policy?!? It is because he is a foreign policy moron. He knows that McCain has a top-notch record on foreign policy. He knows that McCain has the record and the experience that this great nation deserves when it comes to commanding our troops, defending our nation, and spreading the great cause of freedom around the world for all people! McCain is strong and Obama is afraid. Americans deserve a great leader like McCain and they are going to show up in the fall to prove it!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I support McCain in the NC ad battle.

McCain says N.C. Republicans out of touch over ad

(Reporting by David Morgan, editing by Jackie Frank)

Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:44am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican U.S. presidential candidate John McCain accused North Carolina's Republican Party of being "out of touch with reality" over its refusal to pull an advertisement criticizing Democrat Barack Obama.

……………………………………………………………………………………….

I think McCain is onto something here. Let’s face it, the conservative pundits with the exception of Medved and a couple others, were wrong on McCain. We (not that I’m a pundit) thought that McCain didn’t stand a chance. Furthermore, we thought that McCain was not conservative enough for the Republican Party and we didn’t want him to win. Well, the base was wrong; Republicans and independents won McCain the nomination. Maybe, we are out of touch with reality. Maybe, McCain is right.

As for strategy, this is a win-win situation. Obama’s pastor hurts him as a candidate. It keeps Hillary in the race longer. So, the Republican Party can play the ad with its full effect. Meanwhile, McCain looks good to all of those people out there that do want a more, let’s say, traditionally polite campaign. The only thing I’m worried about is that the Democrats will eventually get privy to all of this and nominate Hillary, who I think will be harder for McCain to beat. The excitement for Obama is already wearing off, as all excitement does.

Finally, we need the conservative base to vote for McCain. Don’t abandon him just because he isn’t as conservative as you are. It will just be a shot in the foot of the Republican Party, if we do.

…………………………………………………………………………………………….

In an NBC interview aired on Friday, the Arizona senator said he has done all he can to persuade the state party to cancel the television ad that criticizes Obama as "too extreme" because of controversial remarks made by his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

"They're not listening to me because they're out of touch with reality and the Republican Party. We are the party of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan and this kind of campaigning is unacceptable," McCain told NBC's "Today" Show.

……………………………………………………………………………………………….

McCain brings up an excellent point to remember. He is bringing us back to a traditional and historical perspective that makes the Republican Party look great! Let us thank McCain for that.

………………………………………………………………………………………………..

"I've done everything that I can to repudiate and to see that this kind of campaigning does not continue," he added.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

Republicans, I understand that this comment hurts. But don’t be offended so easily. A McCain win will be a Republican win. Don’t let a little difference in election season become a big difference in the course that we take as a nation.

Ironically, if Obama had spoken about his pastor the same way McCain speaks about the Republican Party, we might actually respect Obama a little. Then again, Obama has no excuse for being in that nut’s church anyway.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Asked if the state party's unwillingness to heed his call raised questions about his leadership, McCain replied: "I don't know exactly how to respond to that."

North Carolina is one of two states holding the next crucial Democratic primaries on May 6 in the tight race between Obama and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton to oppose McCain in the November presidential election.

Obama, an Illinois senator who would be the first black U.S. president, has come under fire for attending Wright's church in Chicago where the fiery black preacher made a number of racially charged statements about the United States.

Wright, who is now retired, said in a PBS interview that people are trying to paint him as "some kind of fanatic."

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………

It is understandable that Wright is upset. He is not a fanatic. He is an entertainer and a fraud. As a privileged, American, male, W.A.S.P. I feel obligated to speak the truth at the risk of overstepping my bounds. Wright exploits the people that he claims to love and his rhetoric of victimization has done more to oppress black Americans than the evil and entirely morally repugnant, sad, sorry, little racists in the K.K.K over the last two or three decades. I can’t do anything for the black community, but I know what the black community needs. It is the same thing that every ethnic group needs; freedom, opportunity, personal responsibility, and leaders who will encourage it.

Back to Mac, McCain is the kind of leader who speaks to all Americans with the same message of freedom and responsibility. He could be the man to draw blacks back to the Republican Party. McCain leads by example. He stood in Arlington before a crowd that won’t vote for him on the anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassination. Although I didn’t agree with him, he has visited Louisiana in the aftermath of Katrina and may appeal to the blacks there. He walked the bridge in Selma on his tour of forgotten places. His example is admirable and it does not go unnoticed. Nothing will change during the campaign, but a McCain presidency shows promise for the improvement of race relations in the future of the Republican Party.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain's Katrina criticisms don't help.

McCain Faults Bush Response to Gulf Storm

By ELISABETH BUMILLER

Published: April 25, 2008

BATON ROUGE, La. — Senator John McCain took direct aim at the Bush administration on Thursday as he stood in the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans, the area hardest hit by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and declared the handling of the disaster “terrible and disgraceful” and pledged that it would never happen again.

Asked at a news conference outside St. David’s Catholic Church if he traced the failure of leadership straight to the top, Mr. McCain, who has said he wants to campaign with President Bush, said emphatically, “Yes.”

Later, Mr. McCain told reporters on his campaign bus that if the disaster had happened on his watch, he would have landed his plane “at the nearest Air Force base and come over personally.”

………………………………………………………………………

McCain took a cheap shot at Bush with his criticism of the Katrina response. He falls right in line with the “government needs to save me” crowd. Look, flying to the disaster area is good for morale and PR. But that isn’t what is going to fulfill the promise never to handle a future disaster the way this disaster was handled.

The truth is that our country is too big for a federal response even to huge disasters. What we need is local disasters response forces and local responsibility. Bill Clinton’s FEMA failed. He missed a great chance to explain carefully that a large centralized government, which is what the Democrats want, is what allows these problems to happen.

It is easy to say what should have been done after the fact.  Criticizing the “little things” like making an appearance at the site is not constructive. McCain runs the risk of alienating the conservative base of the Republican Party that he needs to court.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mitt for Veep!

2008-04-21_1143.png picture by MattLewis01
Matt Lewis reports new website opening: MittforVeep.com.
 
  I support Mitt for VP.

-Mitt will court those conservatives who are wary of McCain

-Mitt and McCain are good in debates, where Obama is weak.

-Mitt’s experience with the economy will support McCain where McCain has admitted weakness. Although, both McCain and Romney are more experienced than Clinton and Obama.

-Mitt gives a good speech. His best has been a speech on religious freedom, sure to appeal to Christians. He is young and attractive. He is likable.

-Mitt is already vetted. He has name recognition because he ran in the primaries. We have already learned about his down

-As Medved argues, Mitt’s weakness in the primary, that he was a panderer, would be a strong point in the VP spot. It is the potential VP’s job to support the Presidential candidate.
 
- The only thing I'm not looking forward to is replays of the commercials Mitt ran against McCain.
 
Otherwise I think we have a winning ticket.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rosenbaum of Huffington: Economy not an issue.

Steve Rosenbaum of the Huffington Post accuses McCain of taking a pass on “all things that might resemble issues” after McCain gives a speech in which he makes very specific proposals. Rosenbaum even responded to the proposals McCain made in the very same blog. How did Rosenbaum miss them? Maybe Rosenbaum doesn’t count taxes, the war, and foreclosures as issues.

Or maybe he is so caught up in the Obamania that he can’t see anything good in anything but Obama. Listen to how Rosenbaum talks about the Obama fundraiser he went to. “Walking in the door, things were different. There was no huge Obama For President banner… Wainwright performed his song "Going to a Town."…[it] has the theme 'I'm so sick of American."…But then - in a hopeful note, he closed with "hallelujah" which was incredibly moving…. The seriousness of the event was strangely inspirational….I left the Paula Cooper Gallery on Saturday with a real sense of the important work ahead, and the opportunity to be part of something really important.” Need I refer Rosenbaum to www.getoverobama.com? But I digress.

…………………………………

Rosenbaum complains, “Yesterday, under pressure from someone or something, McCain came out with his economic 'plan'…McCain gets to continue in Iraq. The Bush tax cuts are made permanent (the tax cuts McCain opposed!). There's relieve for foreclosures that are the result of the mortgage mess, and - wait for it - CORPORATE TAX RELIEF. I love that one.”

…………………………………………

First off, McCain opposed the Bush tax cuts because he wanted Congress to come up with a better plan for tax cuts, not because he opposed them in principle. Secondly, as far as spending, Rosenbaum’s self-identified “man,” Barack also supports relief for foreclosures. The difference is Obama wants to spend more than McCain does.

As for the corporate tax relief, I have a few questions for Rosenbaum. How do you expect to keep American companies that provide jobs and tax revenue in America if you don’t relieve these excessive taxes? Do you suppose your man’s socialist policies will keep companies here while his policies limit the amount that a CEO can earn to 5 times the amount of the lowest paid full time employee? Or should we break our trade agreements that so far have helped stabilize our economy in a downturn?

Look, the problem with all of this is that these socialist policies are the very things that are driving American individuals down. This is so basic; I often wonder why it is even controversial. If more companies are here (and taxes are lower), tax revenue will increase because work and productivity will increase. More Americans will have jobs and they will pay taxes. Here in California we’ve lost tax revenue because companies and wealthy families are forced to move because they can’t afford the high taxes. It’s even worse in San Francisco. For example, restaurant owners can’t give their cooks a pay raise because the city keeps raising the minimum wage which forces the owner to raise the pay for servers who make tips. Meanwhile, this liberal policy hurts the cooks. The hard-working, blue collar, (often Mexican) laborers are actually hurt by liberal controls on the market.

Protectionism and trade is a different issue. I don’t claim to understand the issue fully. It is complicated. The only point I want to make here is that with open trade, you gain jobs and you lose jobs. That’s the nature of the market. Ohio, as I understand, lost jobs in steal manufacturing because of trade, but they gained almost as many jobs in steal distribution because of trade. I won’t say anymore for fear of misspeaking.

…………………………………….

Then Rosenbaum reiterates his confused thinking:

“By rolling back the Federal Government's 18 cent per gallon gas tax. Really. Truly. This is great math….

We'll collect less taxes. We'll spend more money. We'll give tax breaks to corporations. And in the end - we'll come out ahead.

[McCain’s] proven that he's prepared to continue the 8 years of Bush reckless spending.”

………………………………………

I know Rosenbaum doesn’t understand that lowering taxes will actually help Americans and may actually increase tax revenue. But he criticizes McCain for promulgating Bush spending after McCain explicitly stated that Republican’s, including Bush, need to restore the GOP as the party of fiscal responsibility and stop all of the irresponsible spending. McCain’s record, unlike Obama’s, actually supports this view.

Finally, Rosenbaum accuses McCain of pandering. I’m not sure if Rosenbaum is aware that responding to the American people is not pandering. If Americans want lower taxes, why not give Americans lower taxes? I know Rosenbaum believes liberals like him know how to spend other peoples’ money better than they do, but really?

You know? I get my news from the Google News page. Why do they even allow Huffington Post blogs on their page? Huffington Post is perverted, twisted, and their posters use sarcasm to cover up a lack of thoughtful commentary. I’d like to see a well-written Townhall.com column up on Google News. But Google is run by the same liberals that run the news media. Alas, conservatism survives in the hearts and souls of the American people and the news media is left to wonder why they are losing the culture war.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John McCain for Unity!

I don’t understand the call for unity (We're not talking Abraham Lincoln here. He fought a war to perserve the union.), but I know a lot of Barak Obama supporters say that they want it. I heard Art Bell on Coast to Coast AM say, “I’m hoping for an Obama presidency because I think he will really unify the country and that’s something we could really use right now.”

First off, the obvious, I would love unity, if everyone agreed with me.

Second, Barack won’t unify the country. He is too far left. All he will do is get the radical, outspoken protestors to shut up about the presidency.

Here is the clincher. Barack has never done anything with bipartisan support. McCain has. McCain is the one that reaches across the isle. McCain for unity!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »